Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Gamba Osaka season
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- 2020 Gamba Osaka season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Season too far into the future. Fails WP:CRYSTAL. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 18:00, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 20:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - too far in the future, WP:CRYSTALBALL. GiantSnowman 08:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - perWP:CRYSTAL, insufficient information for an article at this moment. Fenix down (talk) 11:47, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, as above. Obvious. Seems there's nothing even the creator can say about it, except slap an infobox on, thus avoiding WP:A3 :D (I see the 2019 games are here too. The same reasoning applies) — fortunavelut luna 14:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.