Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 European Junior Judo Championships

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 European Junior Judo Championships

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sources are primary, which ofc does not contribute to either criteria. All medalists are also red-linked. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Czech Republic. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As this is a notable event. Moreover, a quick Hebrew search of this international event easily found coverage ([1][2][3][4]). I wonder if such an attempt was made before the article was flagged as one that "lacks WP:SIGCOV". CLalgo (talk) 13:06, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those sources are all about Israeli athletes having success at this tournament. Since junior martial arts events don't convey notability, I'm not seeing how this shows the event was notable. WP:NEVENT says an event is notable if it has "enduring historical significance", "a significant lasting effect" (WP:LASTING), and has a "widespread impact" that is "widely covered in diverse sources". I don't see how this tournament meets that when all of its sources seem to be just typical reporting of sports results for a junior event. Papaursa (talk) 15:06, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As stated above, those are just 4 examples of event coverage in a specific language. Others could be easily found, refuting WP:SIGCOV. As to WP:NEVENT, please note the the enduring historical significance & a significant lasting effect are noted for general news events, not necessarily sports ones. As most sport events will never meet standards as high as these, the argument seem irrelevant. CLalgo (talk) 10:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Martial arts. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as a subtopic of a notable sports competition, per WP:SUMMARY. On sources, there is also this report on the Ukrainian team's performance. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 18:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:32, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.