Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2nd Address

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Address

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marginal-to-not notable company; refs are the typical company website + some press releases + some churnalism + maybe one or two independent refs with some discussion... created by likely paid editor, worked on further by definite paid editor. It is saying "Just here for the publicity, ma'am don't mind me". Jytdog (talk) 19:11, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:04, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:04, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy~~ delete as A7 / G11; fails WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:PROMO, with materials such as:

2nd Address services provide a solution to people in need of a temporary furnished home! Etc.

I requested such; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:32, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did not take, so regular "delete" as being promotional 'cruft for a company wiht no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTSPAM, see also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Barbequeue. MER-C 12:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This appears to be yet another corporate advertisement, and if so, is native advertising as defined by the FTC, and thus probably illegal. We don't tolerate promotion of any kind; we most certainly cannot tolerate illegal promotion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.