Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/30 Minutes Book Series

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedied as copyvio by RHaworth. Peridon (talk) 11:06, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

30 Minutes Book Series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find significant discussion of this book in multiple reliable sources per WP:NBOOK. Google search only brings up entries in book seller web sites. Proposed deletion contested. ... discospinster talk 04:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I've tagged this as a speedy deletion for a copyvio because it's copied from the official bookjacket, but even without the copyvio this is still a very non-notable book series. I always feel for the indies and self-published books, but that doesn't mean that they get a free pass. This book isn't notable in the slightest. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:33, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This looks like it comes from a pay-to-publish outfit. Different to lulu and AuthorHouse in that there appears to be some responsibility for the marketing, but there are charges for printing, binding, proofing and editing that a mainline publisher would deal with themselves as part of the overall deal. Sometimes stuff like this makes it to notability, but there's nothing given to indicate this. Just a set of blurbs that in the absence of notability indications are probably to be regarded as promotional. I wish the author luck, but I rather feel that he'll need it. Peridon (talk) 11:00, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.