Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AEDesign (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not a lot of participation here, but since it's already been deleted, I'm inclined to believe this isn't controversial. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:07, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AEDesign

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was previously deleted, but then I foolishly allowed it to be recreated through the Articles for Creation process. Unfortunately, CSD G4 doesn't apply because it's not identical to the deleted version. The current version still fails WP:CORP, however. Cerebellum (talk) 18:59, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 20. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 19:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No signficant coverage in independent reliable sources. There's some mention of them, and if stuff like the cheap rickshawmobile come to fruition, then there's likely to be coverage then, so no prejudice to recreation in the future if that happens. -- Whpq (talk) 18:50, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.