Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIC 4

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A11: Creator states they are a "simulation". Wikipedia is not a webhost, a place for simulations, a place to play games or to host competitions with results you made up one day. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:23, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AIC 4

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Less infos, with no sources. 333 -blue 04:35, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PLZ DON'T DELETE AIC 4. it just a simulation. I want to be a promoter one day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MMAGuy8 (talk • contribs) 04:41, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We do not keep main space encyclopedia articles which are "simulations". We delete them. Use your WP:SANDBOX for experimenting, not the encyclopedia itself. If you want to be a promoter some day, MMAGuy8, then you need to be competent in all that you do. Please read, study and understand Your first article. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:13, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: There is a series of these:
Asia International Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

AIC 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

AIC 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

AIC 5 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

AIC 6 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

— JJMC89 (T·C) 06:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete them all, then, passing administrator. None of them bring any value to the encyclopedia. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:29, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete all This is just experimentation of no value.Peter Rehse (talk) 11:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as speedily as possible. This sort of experimentation has no relevance to Wikipedia. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:08, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.