Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AO Tennis (video game)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 08:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- AO Tennis (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NVG. The sources are only routine coverage or press releases. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 01:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 01:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 01:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. WP:BEFORE. Meets the GNG:
- http://www.ign.com/articles/2017/12/05/ao-tennis-announced-arrives-in-2018
- http://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2018/01/01/the-sports-desk-ao-tennis-serves-up-the-australian-open.aspx
- http://www.pushsquare.com/news/2017/12/ao_tennis_takes_a_shot_at_ps4_in_time_for_the_australian_open
- https://www.gameplanet.co.nz/news/g5a2613a6693fb/Big-Ant-Studios-is-making-an-Australia-Open-tennis-title/
- It's not out yet, but it has caught a bit of attention and should start to look better once it's released and reviews are written. JOEBRO64 01:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - per sources above, and countless others found in a simple Google search. Major sports outlets like Fox Sports are even reporting on it. The article is certainly in awful shape, definitely, but it's still notable, and considering it's coming out next week, there's reason to believe improvement will happen too. Sergecross73 msg me 01:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Significant coverage in numerous independent sources across the world, as others have pointed out. Clearly meets GNG. Kb.au (talk) 02:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - It's a clearly notable release; passes GNG, and will only increase with the release - I've also added the above references to the article. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.