Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Colombia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- HindWiki^Connect 00:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Air Colombia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability and no reliable sources. Bingobro (Chat) 15:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 15:58, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 15:59, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 16:00, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've added a few sources. The notability here is borderline but there, in my opinion. Note also that it's almost ludicrously hard to search for sources because "air Colombia" brings up so much content. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 16:08, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I tried searching under "air colombia villavicencio" to try and cut down the search, but I still only get social media and company directory listings – it seems those passing mentions in books and articles are all there is. Richard3120 (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- sources can be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rusf10 (talk • contribs)

That's not a very good argument – if you think sources can be found, then find them yourself. Richard3120 (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Der Speigel is reliable. I looked on Google Maps, and yes, there were a bunch of DC-3s at the claimed airport. I looked up the registration numbers. Notability? The last outpost using these 70-year-old workhorses is fascinating (along with the Israeli Air Force). Rhadow (talk) 18:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There's enough here now that notability is established enough to satisfy. (Ed, next time, might want to consider the sandbox. ) - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.