Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Evac Lifeteam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. It's a notable organisation according to the volume of news coverage. Fences&Windows 20:56, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Air Evac Lifeteam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, Seems to be non notable. Nothing seperates this Air life from the many more like it. Attempted Prod it was removed so opening this. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:06, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Received plenty of news coverage, is a multi-state organization and also has it's fair share of mentions in Google books. -Marcusmax(speak) 15:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above-described coverage meeting WP:GNG. Andrea105 (talk) 16:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - operates over 100 aircraft in 23 states, provides most rural EMS in those ares.Very Notable--Degen Earthfast (talk) 17:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-Actually 14 states, but whose counting?--71.246.30.208 (talk) 05:44, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:25, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- For reasons stated above.--Kevinharte (talk) 19:49, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.