Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Urbelis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 01:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Urbelis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For a "media personality", the subject has received very little coverage in independent reliable sources. I could not find anything better than the references already present in the article -- all of which are to sources affiliated with the subject. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO.

Created by an SPA, this looks very much like an attempt at promotion Rentier (talk) 06:48, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 12:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 12:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.