Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alistair Day-Stirrat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 12:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alistair Day-Stirrat

Fails WP:ATHLETE. Lithuanian national cricket side is not notable. No evidence of particular notability outside of this, to show passing WP:BIO. Dweller (talk) 13:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 13:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 13:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A gsearch failed to find notable mention (I added the mentions I found to the talk page, but they are all of the "mentioned in passing" type, in my opinion). --Alvestrand (talk) 14:37, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The Lithuanian national side is not a member of the ICC so has never played any official internationals. Either way, no reliable sources are provided, indeed there are no sources provided at all. Andrew nixon (talk) 16:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete provided that the claim 'he helped bring cricket to Lithuania' proves unfounded, and thus he is not notable even as an ambassador of the game, then I would say delete. SGGH ^ping! 18:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - just non notable Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.