Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastasia Yankova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anastasia Yankova

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She fails WP:MMABIO notability criteria, as she does not have any fights in a top tier promotion, her highest ranking according to FightMatrix was #39 in the Women's Flyweight division. Also fails WP:GNG, she appeared in a few Russian Nike commercials but I highly doubt that's enough to pass GNG. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 06:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 06:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 06:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 06:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She has no top tier fights and her ranking has never been high enough to meet WP:NMMA. Since she hasn't fought in over 3 years, neither of those things are likely to change. Coverage is generally routine sports reporting or listings in databases. I don't think appearing in some Russian Nike commercials is sufficient to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 16:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.