Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Gan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:04, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Gan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not meeting minimum notability requirements as per WP:NACTOR. Not enough references in reliable sources to verify notability, hence, failing at WP:GNG. Hitro talk 12:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 12:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 12:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 12:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 12:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He certainly does not meet GNG so we are left with assessing him under NACTOR as mentioned by nom. As he has no awards and has not been the lead in any major films, he doesn't qualify. Of course, if this changes in the future, the article should be open to being recreated. DocumentError (talk) 01:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no indication that he has ever appeared in a notable production, let alone in a significant role.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't care about this subject, but it is worth checking out the articles listed at the Philippine Star. These won't come up in a typical google search, but provides a list of reliable sources. Someone else can decide if they're relevant here.Jacona (talk) 13:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Anyone willing to review possible sources from Jacona's search?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 03:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources are insufficient to establish notability. Many of the top links in Jacona's link apparently refer to other people with the same name. I'll concede, though, that since the actor is Filipino there might be sources out there that aren't easy to find by an English-only speaker like me. TimBuck2 (talk) 21:44, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.