Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Voskamp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Closing own withdrawn nomination as a speedy keep, when all other viewpoints were for keep as well, per WP:NACD. (non-admin closure) - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 18:04, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Voskamp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see a lot of non-independent sources such as interviews and some passing mentions in "best of" lists, but absolutely nothing that meets the WP:GNG as both significant and independent. Tagged for WP:V issues since Feb 2020. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 17:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.