Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antiochian Orthodox Christian Mission in the Philippines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 09:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Antiochian Orthodox Christian Mission in the Philippines

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability and verifiability in question. As per WP:BEFORE I cannot find reliable sources outside the mission and Wikipedia mirrors for the personalities listed in this article. Article has also been unreferenced since 2011. Lenticel ^(talk) 03:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Lenticel ^(talk) 03:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Lenticel ^(talk) 03:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:26, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- This is effectively a denomination, though perhasp a small one. It is not BLP, so that its requirement for citations does not apply. The criterion is verifiable (i.e. probably true) not verified (in-line citations). Internal sources are less desirable than RS, but in some contexts there is nothing else, but the lack of RS is NOT a ground for deletion. Tag for improvement. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:44, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:38, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. –Ctrlwiki (talk) 05:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:GNG per Peterkingiron's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 00:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.