Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armando Wridt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Armando Wridt

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No apparent Notability. I searched Google for this name and found nothing useful. The article cites two sources, one clearly not a Reliable Source, and the other unlikely to be RS:

bjjheroes.com/about clealy self-identifies as a WP:SELFPUBLISHed fan site.
jiujitsutimes.com says they have an ABOUT US page, but it doesn't appear to exist. A Google search on jiujitsutimes gives no indication that it has any reputation for anything, no indication of significance or reliability. It's a Wordpress site. As best I can tell I think it's promotional extension of bjjfanatics.com, which is in the business of martial-arts training camps.

Note: Category:People awarded a red belt in Brazilian jiu-jitsu contains 16 people, 10 of whom are members of the family of the founder of Brazilian jiu-jitsu. I haven't investigated further, but this smells like promotional editing. Alsee (talk) 18:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Alsee (talk) 18:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Martial arts and Brazil. Shellwood (talk) 19:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-existant sourcing, only from jiujitsutimes.com. Even news of his passing isn't found. Oaktree b (talk) 23:53, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG with no evidence of significant independent coverage in reliable sources. The entire article is basically a repost of the bjjheroes.com article, a site anyone can contribute to. There's no supporting evidence of BJJ competitive success and a high rank is generally not considered sufficient for martial arts notability. Papaursa (talk) 23:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.