Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art Whizin
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. The sourcing table has not been responded to or refuted and hence consensus can't exist here given the relatively low participation. No prejudice to an immediate relist if so desired. Daniel (talk) 01:25, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Art Whizin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable local business person. Fails WP:GNG. Mikeblas (talk) 03:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Sportspeople, Food and drink, Boxing, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:BASIC/GNG. In addition to the source in the article [1] there's also [2][3][4][5] and other similar coverage. —siroχo 05:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure how those convey notability. #2 mentions Whizin just once. #3 is about a sign that says "Whizin's", not Art Whizin -- the article isn't about a sign. #4 seems like it's about Bruce Whizin, not Art. #5 is about a dispute Art had with the local Renn Faire. Does fighting the faire make him notable? -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. I believe such an assessment is not entirely accurate with respect to BASIC/GNG. I've included a table below to provide a deeper illustration. —siroχo 17:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure how those convey notability. #2 mentions Whizin just once. #3 is about a sign that says "Whizin's", not Art Whizin -- the article isn't about a sign. #4 seems like it's about Bruce Whizin, not Art. #5 is about a dispute Art had with the local Renn Faire. Does fighting the faire make him notable? -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:18, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to an article about the "Chili Bowl" (which doesn't exist yet); there's more than enough discussion of the history and heritage of the restaurant chain. Oaktree b (talk) 14:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete or Redirect The sources mentioned only have the subject in passing; if there could be a Chili bowl page, then let it be redirected there. GuardianH (talk) 16:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I made my rec above, but here's a source assessment table for the sources I linked: —siroχo 17:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by User:siroxo
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Harvey, 2009, LA Times [6] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
|
✔ Yes |
Pascal, 2013, Arcadia Publishing[7] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ... (p. 105)
|
✔ Yes
|
Sherry, 1998, Daily News | ![]() |
![]() |
~ quotes:
|
~ Partial |
Barker, 1988, LA Times[8] | ![]() |
![]() |
~ quotes
|
~ Partial |
Wilcox, 2006, Daily News [9] | ~ There are quotes from family, but also many facts stated in the voice of the paper. | ![]() |
![]()
|
~ Partial |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. |
- Newspapers.com seems to bring up a good amount of coverage of Whizin, e.g. LA Times feature (p2), Thousand Oaks Star (2 3 4 5) and News-Chronicle. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 05:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 07:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.