Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autodetection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Autodetection

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've declined a WP:PROD on this as deletion of a page that's survived unchallenged since 2003 is never going to be uncontroversial, but I agree that this no longer seems appropriate as a Wikipedia article. It could possibly become a redirect rather than be deleted outright if anyone can think of an appropriate target. ‑ Iridescent 13:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Belongs in a dictionary. Too broad a topic, a bit like Detection.--Pontificalibus (talk) 15:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Not every word gets an entry, and there is no specific encyclopedic topic here really. W Nowicki (talk) 23:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.