Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BMRB Ltd
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect British Market Research Bureau Limited to Kantar Group#Kantar Public Ad Orientem (talk) 15:12, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- BMRB Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of sourcing and information to support WP:GNG guidelines, However I recommend delete BMRB Ltd and redirect British Market Research Bureau Limited to Kantar Group#Kantar Public which now runs that company per 1. Govvy (talk) 15:09, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:21, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:21, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:01, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:01, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:36, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:36, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect as proposed by the nominator. While the present article is poor and unreferenced, intuitively I feel this should be a sustainable article topic. But my searches are finding little to support this, aside from a review of their 1956 "Readings in market research" ((via JSTOR)); I had expected to find more. So without enough for WP:NCORP, I would support the redirect to the current owner, without prejudicing a future article if someone does develop referenced material specific to the historical operation. AllyD (talk) 10:00, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and Redirect as per nom HighKing++ 13:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. \\\Septrillion:- ~~~~10Eleventeen 23:22, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.