Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BaYingQuan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 10:54, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BaYingQuan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article with many primary sources on a small school of martial arts, potentially self-promotional. The article is also very poorly written and referenced from blogs and even Facebook. Mountain^{cirque · Join the Karate Task Force?} 14:29, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article needs serious clean-up and does look like the invention of Neil Ripski with minimal notability. Hard to argue for a keep especially since the article is really a vehicle to promote Ripski.PRehse (talk) 15:30, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I didn't find the significant independent coverage needed to meet WP:GNG and there's nothing to support a claim that WP:MANOTE is met. Papaursa (talk) 02:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.