Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bankalisation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 09:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bankalisation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Un-noteworthy neologism. Google brings back 5 hits, all of which point to the same paper. Blowdart | talk 10:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If the AfD is closed as delete, this redirect [1] should be deleted as well. --Twinzor (talk) 10:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Primary editor has the same name as the person who the article claims coined the term. Possible self-promotion, definite neologism as per nom. Jim Miller (talk) 11:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable and unverifiable neologism. We used to call these protologisms, although I'm not sure that's a word. Stifle (talk) 12:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even though I heard this word before (only in the Media), but Wikipedia is not a dictionary, its an encyclopedia. It probably should be in Wiktionary. Lehoiberri (talk) 01:19, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.