Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bella Karoli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bella Karoli

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. Can't find anything on the subject. scope_creep^Talk 09:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 09:57, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 09:57, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 09:57, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of GNG. I didn't find anything at all on one listed book, no reviews on the other (and one book isn't likely to give a pass of WP:NAUTHOR). WP:TNT applies if nothing else to this undersourced and autobiographical-appearing article. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. There's absolutely nothing to demonstrate that the subject of this page has achieved notability. Looking at the content and edit history, it quacks like an autobiography. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 12:41, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Clearly fails notability guidelines. — Goszei (talk) 01:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If deleted, it should be redirected to Béla Károlyi, as its a misspellings appearing in a number of English language sources. --Rob (talk) 01:10, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not found. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:32, 10 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Books appear to be self-published and (more importantly) unreviewed, and the article (judging from a mess of repetitive bare-url citations) appears to be purely self-sourced. No notability evident. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:51, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As others have said, doesn't appear to be notable at this stage. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:07, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per all. -Hatchens (talk) 03:11, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.