Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berona's War
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep withdrawn by nominator. Eluchil404 (talk) 07:22, 1 October 2023 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Berona's War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE on this article about a book series, of which one, the Wired review, is significant coverage. I cannot find other coverage, however, and think that this does not meet WP:NBOOK. Tacyarg (talk) 22:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and United States of America. Tacyarg (talk) 22:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. We have two or more reviews in RS with SIGCOV, meeting WP:NBOOK#C1 so far I count 3. While the reviews focus on a single entry (Field Guide), I think keeping it at this title is best.
- Note, there's also a review from a long-running blog published by a professional freelance writer, which may be usable.[3]
- —siroχo 00:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- Withdraw (as nom). Thanks - I could only find the Wired review, and agree 2+ reviews meets the first criterion. Tacyarg (talk) 00:20, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.