Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond the Ring

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:55, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond the Ring

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, lacking significant coverage from independent sources, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 12:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:28, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article lacks any reliable sources of any kind at all, which is way, way below our bare minimum requirements to have an article on a film.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:20, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find anything that would establish notability. It doesn't seem to have gained much attention other than some mentions in passing in a few newspapers. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 23:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's no indication that this meets any of the notability criteria for films and I found no significant independent coverage that proves to me that WP:GNG is met. Papaursa (talk) 03:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.