Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bosphorus Development

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. I find the arguments of those arguing for Delete more persuasive, along with the source tables. Those advocating Keep have to present sources to back their view that sources exist. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bosphorus Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for a company that fails WP:NCORP. All sources are WP:ORGTRIV (routine coverage of market entries, financing, awards, etc.), WP:PRIMARYSOURCES (interviews, self-published materials), or otherwise unreliable sources. WP:BEFORE search turned up nothing validating notability. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom ~Politicdude (About me, talk, contribs) 18:25, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 17:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Source assessment table: prepared by User:Dclemens1971
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://biz.liga.net/all/all/press-release/turetskiy-developer-bosphorus-development-vyhodit-na-ukrainskiy-rynok-nedvijimosti No Press release No Self-published source Yes The source discusses the subject directly and in detail No
https://mind.ua/openmind/20234520-zakordonnij-dosvid-yak-tureckij-developer-osvoyue-ukrayinskij-rinok No Authored by the chairman of Bosphorus Development Yes Yes The source discusses the subject directly and in detail No
https://archive.kyivpost.com/business-wire/new-international-development-sector-player-enters-ukraine.html No Authored by the chairman of Bosphorus Development Yes Yes The source discusses the subject directly and in detail No
https://interfax.com.ua/news/interview/786357.html No As a WP:INTERVIEW, this is a primary source Yes Yes The source discusses the subject directly and in detail No
https://globaldesignnews.com/renzo-pianos-istanbul-modern-is-inspired-by-the-bosphorus-waters-its-reflections-of-sunlight-and-its-locations-heritage/ Yes Yes No The source does not even mention the subject. No
https://forbes.ua/ru/company/bosphorus-development-yak-providniy-turetskiy-developer-vikhodit-na-ukrainskiy-rinok-nerukhomosti-20122021-3011 Yes Yes No The source only includes a WP:TRIVIALMENTION of Bosphorus Development / Босфорус Девелопмент No
https://emlakkulisi.com.tr/ece-turkiye-aqua-floryanin-kiralama-faaliyetlerini-ustlendi/372671 No Apparent WP:TRADES publication Yes No The source does not even mention the subject. No
https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/haberleri/aqua-florya-avm Yes Yes No The source does not even mention the subject. No
https://expatguideturkey.com/top-10-highest-buildings-in-turkey/ ~ No Blog No The source does not even mention the subject. No
https://web.archive.org/web/20230726120751/http://bunews.com.ua/interviews/item/leading-turkish-developer-enters-the-expanding-ukrainian-real-estate-market ~ An interview-based article ~ Possibly excluded as a WP:TRADES publication ~ The source discusses the subject in detail but mostly about a market entry, a subject excluded as SIGCOV under WP:ORGTRIV ~ Partial
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Source assessment table: prepared by User:Dclemens1971
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ekonomi/gayrimenkulde-2016nin-yildizlari-40274467 Yes Yes No The source does not even mention the subject. No
https://www.ekoyapidergisi.org/istanbul-tower-205-e-european-property-awards-dan-2-odul ~ ~ No The source does not even mention the subject. No
https://www.aksam.com.tr/yasam/istanbul-tower-205e-european-property-awardsdan-2-odul/haber-773563 Yes Yes No The source does not even mention the subject. No
https://www.propertyturkey.com/news/istanbuls-second-tallest-building-sold-for-594-million-usd Yes No WP:BLOG No The source does not even mention the subject. No
https://thepage.ua/real-estate/tureckaya-kompaniya-ne-razglashaet-lokaciyu-svoih-zhk-v-centre-kieva-do-nachala-stroitelnyh-rabot Yes Yes No News about new location openings/market entries is not WP:SIGCOV per WP:ORGTRIV. No
https://emerging-europe.com/business/no-time-to-wait-ukraines-reconstruction-begins-now/ Yes An interview-based article Yes No A trivial mention as part of a broader story No
https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/press-release/910561.html Yes Yes No A single trivial mention as part of a broader story No
http://stroyobzor.ua/ru/kiev/news-builders/start-prodazhu-kvartir-v-zhk-biznes-klasu-maxima-residence-na-pechersku ? ? ? Unable to access, blocked as a malicious website. ? Unknown
https://www.ukrhaber.com/blog/bir-turk-sirketi-ukrayna-emlak-piyasasina-giriyor-ilk-projesi-kievde-bir-konut-kompleksi/ Yes No Blog No News about new location openings/market entries is not WP:SIGCOV per WP:ORGTRIV. No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To see if there is any editor response to the source analysis presented.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Also, the "Business Ukraine" article marked as "partial" in the source assess table relies entirely on an interview with the founder with no in-depth Independent Content. HighKing++ 11:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.