Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan McConville

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:27, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan McConville

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG. He shows up in Google, but not as much as the Irish dissident, and there was also a music professor of the same name. It has been tagged for blp sources and notability for 6 and a half years. Boleyn (talk) 12:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. TheQ Editor (Talk) 13:36, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete An article created by an apparent SPA and not improved in years can't be all that notable. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:36, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep -- Is three books published by academic publishers enough for notability: rather marginal a to my mind.Peterkingiron (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per WP:AUTHOR. His books include The King's Three Faces, which has been fairly widely reviewed. I added some of those reviews to the entry. EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 20:45, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Hahc21 23:47, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.