Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brittani Nichols

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Consensus here is that sources are sufficient to demonstrate GNG. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brittani Nichols

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability — in this case, lack of produced work of their own, seems like the person was only limited participant in smaller projects and no outside work of their own credit (that I could find). Article mainly cites primary sources and the living person’s own social media.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 305Askins (talk • contribs) 21:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Sportspeople, Television, Sexuality and gender, California, Connecticut, and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:17, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per past examples of marginal notability of film directors. Usually the film(s) are merged into the director's article, which is what I recommend in this place. If you need actual precedents, I can provide them, but long story short, there is usually not enough coverage of either director and film(s), but there is enough for both when considered in totality. Bearian (talk) 17:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bearian, what is the Merge target article you are proposing? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Again, what Merge target article is being proposed here?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Suicide Kale (which I think is what the above person meant to propose?) PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that would be appropriate. Bearian (talk) 13:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Subject looks notable to me. Based on my own search and research, she has an ample amount of coverage, which to a large extent establishes notability. Mevoelo (talk) 20:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Subject easily meets GNG and has significant coverage in multiple media sources. For example, CNN, Variety, Huffington Post, The New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, Entertainment Weekly, among others. The subject has also won an NAACP award and was nominated for a major emmy (now added to article) Affied (talk) 19:03, 8 March 2024 (UTC) 20:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The above sources show WP:GNG. Variety is brief but qualifying coverage. The HuffPo article is an interview, but there is journalistic coverage at the top; the Tribune coverage is the same. The NYT is a full feature. The other two are not qualifying sources. -- asilvering (talk) 20:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.