Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budget Cuts
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Oops. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm Bacon 05:27, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Budget Cuts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. This Forbes] piece is by a contributer, so it is not a reliable source. See WP:FORBESCON. [1] is an acceptable source. [2] is about the sequel, not this game. The sequel may be notable, but for this first one, the Verge piece is all I can find. Hog Farm Bacon 05:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 05:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Review in the notable source JeuxVideo.com (French) [3], the notable source 4Players.de (German) [4], a review in Eurogamer [5], a development interview in Gamasutra [6], some mentions in PC Gamer [7]. Clearly passes WP:GNG.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:23, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Also an unsourced review in UploadVR [8]. --Masem (t) 05:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.