Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBOSS Corporation
Tools
Actions
Allgemein
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- CBOSS Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are no proper sources in the current article and a Google News Archives search turns up empty. CorporateM (Talk) 02:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:40, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:40, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, there are variants of company name, and for "CBOSS" Russia there are two news in the google's archive: [1] : 1 and 2. But If we consider russian news aggregator, e.g. news.yandex.ru, with cboss we will got hundreds of articles. Recently company was banned from Mobile World Congress (co.uk, com) `a5b (talk) 09:12, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, cleanup and watchlist. CorporateM (Talk) 12:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, has 3 sources including the Telegraph. Seems to satisfy WP:SOURCES ~~ Sintaku Talk 10:39, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.