Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CRF Frozen Foods recall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Product_recall#2016. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:05, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CRF Frozen Foods recall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another news event. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:20, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge - The article describes a product recall involving over 300 CRF Frozen Foods and Garland Ventures Limited consumer goods delivered under more than 40 different brand names. If the article cannot be kept, it should be merged with Listera (or a similar article), as this is a widely encompassing issue. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Other potential redirect targets might be Product_recall#2016 or List of foodborne illness outbreaks in the United States, as under these circumstances, CRF Frozen Foods may be a highly searched term. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:25, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, topic has been discussed in the news media and analyzed in secondary sources. See Peanut Corporation of America, a company which murdered people. Heaviside glow (talk) 21:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just a news event. Could be merged into CRF Frozen Foods. The Banner talk 22:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:10, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:10, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:10, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:14, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Product_recall#2016 or some other appropriate target article. Per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:PAGEDECIDE, this event is best understood within the context of an article about food product recalls or an article about organizations that were impacted by the recall. If we had an article for CRF Foods, then this information should certainly be included as a sub-section of that article, but CRF does not have its own article. Instead, CRF Frozen Foods and CRF Foods are redirects that currently send readers to CRF Frozen Foods recall. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 23:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Product_recall#2016. Gioto (talk) 04:16, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Per [1],

"The company's products include 40 different brands names sold in all 50 states, as well as in Canada and Mexico. The recall continues to grow because other processed foods use CRF ingredients."

Also, per [2], "Products were both packaged for sale as individual products and repackaged by places like Piggly Wiggly, Kroger and ConAgra foods as ingredients in a host of other store-brand and private-label products for stores like Trader Joe's and Costco.

Also, retailers including Target and regional distributors such as Midwest grocery chain Hy-Vee Foods have recently recalled products made by Tokyo-based Ajinomoto Windsor due to the company recalling 70 of its Asian variety products that contain CRF vegetables — about 22 million kilograms worth — some of which were also sold in Canada and Mexico." --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's simply still nothing actually convincing for its own notable article. SwisterTwister talk 05:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Product recall § 2016, which presently has a single very short sentence about this topic. This will improve the merge target. WP:PRESERVE appropriate content. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as above, seems an eminently sensible suggestion - this isn't really article material per WP:NOTNEWS but it's useful information to have *somewhere*. Fosse 8► 16:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.