Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cacoy Doce Pares Eskrima

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Doce Pares. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cacoy Doce Pares Eskrima

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable martial art with no independent sources. Dwanyewest (talk) 00:12, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it could use a clean-up and needs major sourcing, though. Yeah, definitely a soup sandwich, but maybe salvageable, if not I'd merge the important parts into the main Escrima article.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 01:14, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Keep per Mike. - Ret.Prof (talk) 03:15, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Astudent0 (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge into Doce Pares Either way most of this article should go. The only independent mention appears to be on two pages of a book. Astudent0 (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, I would support a merge into Doce Pares.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 19:01, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I merged the pertinent info into Doce Pares. I can add more sources to that piece later, it needs a workup.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 19:10, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Doce Pares If reliable sources can later be added, then maybe it can be recreated as an individual article. Papaursa (talk) 12:58, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.