Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calday grange CCF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Punkmorten 22:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Calday grange CCF

Per discussion in the AfD for this school's A-V club. This is the junior cadet chapter at a grammar school in Merseyside. The program may be notable. Chapters at individual schools is not. Fan1967 14:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nn program. Wikibout-Talk to me! 15:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. Ifnord 17:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NN, main section is text dump from here so possible copyvio, Army section perhaps the epitome of "unencyclopedic", featuring huge unnecessary 1740x1158 images. --DaveG12345 19:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The pictures could be resized, but let's face it, why bother? Fan1967 19:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, local chapters of junior cadet programs are not notable on their own. --Coredesat 20:47, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above (the only appropriate article related to this is the broad Combined Cadet Force article for the whole UK organisation. Jammo (SM247) 23:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I was a member of the Cross-Country team, the Rugby team, the Wargames Society, the Electronics Club, the Debating Society, a Librarian, sat on the Sixth Form Steering Committee at the school etc etc. Why do none of these appear as separate articles (after all many were as influential or important as the CCF)? Answer: obvious. Far too minimal importance. If it has any merit, it can go in the school's entry. Francis Davey 19:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable and the article is complete crap. Modulus86 16:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. DJ Clayworth 17:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Why not? Francis Davey, what significance does any of that have? DaveG, i know for a fact theres no copyvio, beacause i helped write the text for the schools main website, and none of it is copywrited. The article has now been made less 'crap', modulus 86, Fan 1967, what pictures? and this does provide useful and wanted information for those members of the school who are just curious of the activities of the ccf, and those who are considering becoming part of it. Additionally mr davey, what part do the afformentioned societies play in the ccf? as of now, none. What harm can be done by leaving it? Maybe someone can answer this uestion, i can't myself, if you don't want to read it, don't! it's as simple as that. Refer to my comments on the page about the schools"AV club", which incidentally it is not.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.65.107.236 (talk • contribs)

Comment "What pictures?" This edit [1] shows that the pictures were removed by IP address 84.65.107.236. That's you. Fan1967 15:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As much passionate hatred as I have for your "notability" rampages, if you must have a reason, maybe you should consider the fact that Raymond Towers Holmes passed through this ccf section. In case you do not know, he is a ww2 fighter pilot who saved buckingham palace by crashing his hurricane into the german aircraft, having no ammunition... blah blah - just read the wiki. not sure if this is on the page, but if not then It will be added, then it has "notability" and you can leave it alone and go and have a go at something else, although I wouldnt be surprised if there is some kind of quota for how many hundred famous personell must be involved with something for it to be "notable". Please stop this madness on this and the Technical Crew page with notability and leave it alone - there's really no need for this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vwozone (talk • contribs)
Comment See my most recent comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calday Grange technical crew. There is a need for this to be discussed and in light of the above probably deleted. SM247^{My Talk} 03:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.