Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cariuma
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 02:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cariuma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks not-notable, with no reliable independent, in-depth sources BoraVoro (talk) 09:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Brazil. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, I created the page because the brand is very popular among skaters and it's also a major vegan shoe brand just like Allbirds and Veja. I have already created pages for shoes and saw that this was deleted because the company had tried to create their own page but I didn't remake it because they told me to. I'll work to improve it and add more sources but none of the sources I used come from the company at all. LeDroider (talk) 04:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, covered in Barron's,[1] USA Today,[2] and Insider,[3][4] although I'm not sure how much "affiliate commission" comes into play. 70.163.208.142 (talk) 21:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To assess sources presented against our RS guidelines.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 09:59, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I found dozens of news articles using Google News. I have not had time to evaluate them.
- --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 19:59, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - agree with A.B. about the plethora of news articles from Google News. The line between promotion, review, and "objective" information is fuzzy but the notability is not in question. Kazamzam (talk) 17:26, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.