Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartoon Network (Canada)
Tools
Actions
Allgemein
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 22:48, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Cartoon Network (Canada) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:HOAX material, not blatant enough to qualify for G3. Also included is another article which quickly popped up after the first was tagged
- Cartoon Network (Canadian TV channel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) treelo radda 10:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- treelo radda 10:34, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm not sure it's a hoax, but the brevity of this article makes it impossible to determine its genuineness or notability. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 17:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Both per WP:HOAX. There are no reliable sources about this alleged network. Both (poorly worded at that) articles proclaim that this network will replace Teletoon, but a Google News search for Teletoon brings up nothing about the demise of the network and its replacement with this alleged "Cartoon Network Canada". Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 21:01, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Complete hoax, total bollocks, and believe you me, there would be plenty of sources if this were true, because the amount of "Yet another Canadian network gives up their identity to the Americans, how dare they?" articles would blow up Google. Here though, it's a fake, and poorly written at that. Nate • (chatter) 21:43, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: Hoax. Joe Chill (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.