Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Social and Economic Research (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus after relisting. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Center for Social and Economic Research

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1st AfD didn't form properly so didn't actually happen. If the claims here are true, there is notability, but I couldn't verify it. Tagged for 7 years for notability; hopefully we can get it resolved. Boleyn (talk) 10:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:33, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 20:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I speedy tagged this because it is obviously not an acceptable article. Notifying DGG for his analysis. SwisterTwister talk 18:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It might be notable, but this is a press release. Lack of notability is not the only reason for deletion. Borderline notability combined with clear promotionalism is an good reason for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 19:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Searches cannot find any evidence of notability or any mentions in reliable sources AusLondonder (talk) 18:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.