Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandraprabha Vidyapitha, Paksey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The argument essentially boils down to whether this is a high school or not. There has been no coherent discussion after 3 listing periods to determine if it is or not. Therefore, I see no other option than "no consensus". (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 21:54, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chandraprabha Vidyapitha, Paksey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be about a non-secondary educational institution with no claim to notability. There are no sources cited. Hopelessly promotional. PROD was removed w/o explanation or improvement. Ad Orientem (talk) 07:09, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it's a high school, also seems to be a notable one in Ishwardi Upazila as it's government portal describes it here. --Zayeem ^(talk) 19:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:V. Unscintillating (talk) 06:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Secondary schools are notable by long-standing consensus and precedent. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.