Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Cowie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 17:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Cowie

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Players appearing in the Scottish Championship this season no longer get the presumption of notability through WP:NFOOTBALL as per WP:FPL.

In terms of WP:GNG, there are four paragraphs in this news source on his debut. He then gets name checks in Daily Record, Fife Today and BBC. In my view, not enough coverage in multiple sources for GNG at this moment. Spiderone 22:26, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 22:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 10:04, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable 16-year-old football player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As it stands does not currently meet notability requirements. Dunarc (talk) 22:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I see enough sources in one google search to pass GNG in my opinion. The article is perfectly structured, nothing wrong with it and we have draft space for a reason which you all seem to have forgotten. Govvy (talk) 13:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The only one that I found that was more than a passing mention was the DNG24 one. Even the BBC one doesn't really address him in depth. I wouldn't oppose draftifying but my understanding is that we only tend to do that if the subject is playing in a fully pro league and would be likely to pass NFOOTBALL soon Spiderone 15:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.