Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chefs Center of California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 03:46, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chefs Center of California

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient verifiable, reliable sources to establish notability of an organization. Only one online article mentions the center by name; another one mentions a previous name for the org, mainly in passing. Otherwise, the claims to fame are being somehow involved with a handful of locally notable and tasty new restaurants (including some I've eaten at). tedder (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 14:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weed out the promotional content and keep. A notable economic development endeavor of the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles, has received coverage in multiple reliable sources including Bloomberg Businessweek, passes WP:GNG.--Arxiloxos (talk) 15:00, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - A quick google news search registers 272 hits, and 2910 hits for a more general search on google. This article may fall under WP:LOCAL. If it is to be keep the promotional nature of it needs to be changed, and it needs to be improved greatly. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show me the gnews search you are using? In quotes, I find zero. Without quoting the subject, it's just a string of very generic words. tedder (talk) 21:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This wiki entry is straight out of their monthly email newsletter. The style of writing is exactly the same. Cross-reference with a google of EHALA news letter.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no extensive coverage. 2 gnews hits. LibStar (talk) 23:54, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete weak coverage and all local. Stormbay (talk) 03:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unverified. Most of the links at the article refer to other facilities (primarily Mama's Small Business Kitchen Incubator), rather to Chefs Center of California. --MelanieN (talk) 01:42, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mama's and Chefs Center are the same organization: Mama's Small Business Kitchen Incubator was the original name, later changed to the current name.[1]--Arxiloxos (talk) 07:08, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then maybe the article should be moved to Mama's Small Business Kitchen Incubator - since that name has sourcing and the current title doesn't. (The sourcing for Mama's is minimal but might be enough for bare notability.) The current title finds only a single hit at Google News Archive, and that's just a passing mention. --MelanieN (talk) 15:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.