Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Conway (psychic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:43, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Conway (psychic)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject insufficiently notable. No coverage in reliable sources outside of inclusion in the cast list for the show. Mcewan (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 01:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No trace of notability. --Lockley (talk) 19:00, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per the nomination. Not enough evidence of notability. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 02:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appearing in several episodes of a relatively minor TV show does not make one notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.