Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Weick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 08:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Christine Weick

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Much as it may delight us to document the crazy antics of this lady, the only incident that gained any mainstream attention at all was the original slushie-throwing incident, and even that only made HuffPo, scarcely a neutral commentator on right wing people. The rest of the sources are garbage and Google shows nothing better. Guy (Help!) 21:15, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:29, 18 November 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Keep The 2015 version of the article at special:diff/645034914 showed that this person was the subject of media attention for multiple unrelated events. This person meets WP:GNG. Citations show this person featured as a subject in venues including Fox News, ABC News, The Washington Post, and The Christian Post. Comedy Central's Tosh.0 ran a five-minute documentary on this person. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Surprisingly and seemingly unrelated to any recent event, The Washington Post just published a more complete biography on this person a month ago.

Carman, Tim (23 October 2018). "The woman who claims Monster Energy drinks are a tool of the devil is back, just in time for Halloween". Washington Post.

Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the sources listed above were not network news, but were local stations. I changed the Fox News and ABC News to the stations. StrayBolt (talk) 04:14, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Snow Keep No compliance with WP:Before. Sources per User:Bluerasberry established WP:GNG. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:36, 18 November 2018 (UTC) Sources added/restored. Should be a candidate for WP:Snow. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 04:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For some reason back in February 2015 an editor decided it was a good idea to delete most of the reliable sources while retaining the crap sources.[1] And here were are. I've restored many sources but it needs further work. Some of the YouTube links should have a |via= as they are actually mainstream local news broadcasts which are not credited in the cite. -- GreenC 23:44, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:48, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:49, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:49, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the via=YouTube and the attributions to mainstream media, which are now wikified. She is definitely a few bricks short of a full load (the MONSTER drink video is telling), but that is unrelated to WP:GNG. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 03:49, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:59, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Seems obvious. The WaPo article from just last month seals GNG and eliminates any ONEEVENT kinda claims. This AfD is the work of Satan! 192.160.216.52 (talk) 19:38, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is unquestionably remarkable the WaPo article came out just a few weeks ago. This is a Jesus in the toast moment. -- GreenC 21:48, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus toast Some intended irony, I am sure. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.