Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinema of Change

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cinema of Change

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable per WP:WEB: podcast has interviewed some notable people, but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Can't find significant coverage online from WP:Secondary, WP:Reliable sources. There are many groups called "Cinema of Change" in several countries, so Google hits appear to be high, but all I can find on this one is primary sources and passing mentions in secondary sources. Evident WP:Conflict of interest by creator, who ~~appears to be connected with Rippberger~~ is Rippberger's partner, and has so far only edited about him and his work. Wikishovel (talk) 02:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 02:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 02:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per above, cannot inherit notability from people interviewed on the shot. I could not locate significant third party sources for any additional notability verification. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 03:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect for now to a sourced mention in article of founder Robert Rippberger#Career, until it develops an independent notability. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 11:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Adam9007 (talk) 18:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete my search here: [1]. sources just not there.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.