Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Baldwin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty (talk) 10:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cliff Baldwin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable former NFL player who played in 3 games in 1920-1921. A WP:BEFORE yields no instances of WP:SIGCOV on Newspapers.com, Google Books, or Google itself. Therapyisgood (talk) 09:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football, and Indiana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:GNG with WP:SIGCOV which I have now added to the article. Cbl62 (talk) 12:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Cbl62. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:50, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Cbl62. I appreciate their work in improving the article! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

.Keep Thanks to the work of Cbl62. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 17:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets GNG per WP:HEY. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 20:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GNG. Just because he only played 3 games does not make him non-notable. Rlendog (talk) 01:42, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per the sourcing and improvements to the article since this AfD nomination was opened. Ejgreen77 (talk) 03:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Has a bunch of articles and clearly meets WP:GNG KatoKungLee (talk) 16:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article subject has WP:NOTABILITY by WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS meeting WP:GNG and WP:NATHLETE. There is also a strong case for keeping per WP:HEY. Shawn Teller (talk) 01:33, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.