Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clubbing axe
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 03:21, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Clubbing axe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Like Antonina Markovic, I also cannot find anything to confirm this is real. If it is, then it's not notable and full of original research. Adam9007 (talk) 01:18, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Axe it. Individual foam weapons don't merit articles. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete not even a redirection to foam fighting is useful in this case. AadaamS (talk) 06:40, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete As per Axe it.Peter Rehse (talk) 18:34, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete With no sources and no indication of notability, there doesn't appear to be any reason to keep this article. Papaursa (talk) 20:21, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Axe it, as per Clarityfriend. Not notable for encyclopedic tastes. The Snowager-is awake 07:05, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.