Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coal Hill School (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Class (2016 TV series). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coal Hill School

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite being a frequently recurring location and the main setting of an entire show, the location itself doesn't display individual notability. Outside of one Radio Times article I found discussing it in depth, it doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV. Pokelego999 (talk) 00:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Television. Pokelego999 (talk) 00:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Article doesn't meet WP:GNG without reliable third-party sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 22:26, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Class (2016 TV series). I could not find evidence of significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources, but I always think that redirection is a better solution than outright deletion. I chose Class as a redirect target as that it is the main setting for the show and would seem more fitting than Doctor Who where it plays a more minor role by comparison. I would not entirely opposed to deletion, but since a viable redirect target does exist, I think that is preferable over that option as it would help readers. Aoba47 (talk) 22:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect due to this failing WP:GNG and being just an unencyclopedic plot summary. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:53, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.