Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communal anarchy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:05, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Communal anarchy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neo-logism, no content —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm sure this happens. It sounds like my house. But no source provided to say that this is a notable name for it, and no information on the topic itself. Borock (talk) 22:16, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as Wikipedia is not a dictionary and it is a non-notable neologism. By the way is Wikipedia a communal anarchy? =) Armbrust Talk Contribs 12:42, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it is. :-) Borock (talk) 13:58, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There's actually a pretty solid case to be made that Wikipedia is anarchist in essence. Carrite (talk) 15:43, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure And a a case that it's not. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:11, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There's actually a pretty solid case to be made that Wikipedia is anarchist in essence. Carrite (talk) 15:43, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it is. :-) Borock (talk) 13:58, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as dictionary definition. Redirect to Anarchism. Carrite (talk) 15:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and don't redirect. It's not a plausible search term. --MelanieN (talk) 03:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.