Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of the 12-hour and 24-hour clocks
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 11:18, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comparison of the 12-hour and 24-hour clocks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Comparison of the various advantages of different times. Content forks from the respective methods pages, and and uncited unencyclopedic comparison. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 21:55, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as this is largely original research. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 23:05, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as OR, redundant to 24-hour clock. I guess you can make an overly complex description of just about anything simple, although the difference between the two clocks is fairly obvious to any person who ever learned how to tell time. Beyond that, one can compare anything to anything. Imagine how much one could write about the differences between shoes with laces and shoes with velcro straps. Mandsford (talk) 13:21, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as just somebody's essay. Mangoe (talk) 13:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - subject non-relevant--Karljoos (talk) 14:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete since it looks like someone's homework. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 19:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Let we explain why it was made to begin with. It was made following discussions [1], [2] on the inconsistencies between the two articles. The artilces were also being overrun with with comparisons instead of talking about the topics. This article was therefore made to work this out. Also there is significant content in this article that has never been and would be inappropriate to out in one of its two "parent" artilces. Zginder 2009-10-27T13:54Z (UTC)
- Merge to 24-hour clock, then merge 12-hour clock and rename the joined article. Miami33139 (talk) 17:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless a rescuer can come up with sufficient reliable sources for the comparison as its own subject. While I sympathize with the problem of keeping unwanted material out of the individual clock-type articles, a separate article for the comparison seems inconsistent with WP:FORK unless it can sustain itself as a notable subject in its own right. With nary a sign of a source anywhere in the article, this comes across as pure original research. --RL0919 (talk) 17:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.