Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Composite Win (Horse Racing Terminology)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:30, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Composite Win (Horse Racing Terminology)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These are jargon-specific terms the Hong Kong Jockey Club uses for some of its bets. This doesn't really need an individual article as it is not notable outside of the club, yet it doesn't need a redirect either because there aren't other articles on composite wins. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Horse racing-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTHOWTO and this type of bet is only relevant to one particularly jockey club. Ajf773 (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:23, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I wish this series could have been bundled but I have recently discovered the criteria is now very narrow and some editors will procedurally vote keep - even if it appears they would otherwise agree with the deletion. Ifnord (talk) 17:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.