Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornelious Drane (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cornelious Drane

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxer with the first AfD closed for spurious reasons. Fails WP:NBOX and WP:GNG. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:06, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:06, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just another Sherman Bergman promo vanity article. The second, by a previously identified sock farm acct that lasted for one month in 2008 and created 2 articles that promo'd sports subjects which fail any notability standard. In this case, subject fails WP:NBOX and WP:GNG. Also there is no coverage to verify unsourced Golden Globes championship claim. X4n6 (talk) 04:57, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NBOX and lacks the significant coverage required by GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 10:00, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable; fails WP:NBOX. -- Softlavender (talk) 02:04, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NBOX. --Donniediamond (talk) 10:43, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the first AfD can't be considered and none of this suggests better for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:18, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.