Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Councilman Rich Becker
Tools
Actions
Allgemein
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Councilman Rich Becker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A few newspaper articles don't make for notability, and the position the subject occupies is not inherently notable. Drmies (talk) 20:41, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A councilman is not notable enough to include in Wikipedia. Could Wikipedia have an article about every councilman? No. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 16:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems to fail WP:POLITICIAN. Baseball Watcher 15:50, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all of the above. Also, the coverage seems not to be about him, but about actions the town board has made. Bearian (talk) 16:46, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.