Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristina Stanciu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 08:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cristina Stanciu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter. Even after she makes her scheduled UFC debut, she will not meet WP:NMMA. Article was created WP:TOOSOON. No objection to saving copy of article in userspace until she becomes notable.Mdtemp (talk) 15:56, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nominator.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The "multiple issues" banner was just added recently. Keep it there and allow an opportunity to improve the article. VanEman (talk) 22:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That a banner was added recently does not indicate notability or justify a vote to keep the article. Papaursa (talk) 02:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete When COI's create articles, they need to be deleted unless the subject without question passes notability, otherwise we will continue to over cover American people and undercover Congoleese people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:44, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Plenty of room for the article to be improved, the issue of persons editing being close to the subject I dont feel is an issue. Its not a situation where the page is about someone political, or in the media etc, so bias not an issue. If there was to be deletion it would be under notability, which technically she does not fill but the lack of womens organisations on the notability list doesnt really help. As the first Romanian in the UFC i would say that is notable. Dimspace (talk) 17:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you admit she doesn't meet any notability criteria, what is the basis of your vote to keep the article? Being the first female Romanian fighter in the UFC is not a notability criteria (and is an unsourced claim). Papaursa (talk) 02:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An article doesn't have to be political to be biased. People are biased towards their friends and sports teams.Mdtemp (talk) 14:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Because she's Wushu National Champion (Seniors). Additionally bronze medalist in the World and Euro Champs (Juniors). Furthermore, she's the first ever Romanian to compete in the UFC (Man or Woman). Dariusz gibak (talk) 12:56, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your first edit so you might want to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies such as the one on notability (WP:N). There are also policies on notability for athletes (WP:NSPORT) and MMA (WP:NMMA). Junior events do not show notability because that's not considered competing at the highest level. Being the first female fighter in the UFC also doesn't meet any notability criteria when she fails the basic criteria for MMA fighters.Mdtemp (talk) 14:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She made her debut in a major UFC event five days ago. She may technically not have been notable when this AfD was created because the event hadn't happened yet, but it has now. Smartyllama (talk) 15:17, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NMMA asks for 3 top tier appearances. She lost her first fight which makes a run of three less likely.Peter Rehse (talk) 15:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 17:36, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable as an MMA fighter and I don't see the coverage needed to show she meets WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 04:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and NMMA. I found no reliable coverage that could be used to save the article. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 00:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now. May become ready for inclusion with a couple more pro fights under her belt. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 10:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.